A federal judge has ruled that Kentucky churches can resume in-person worship without fear that police and health officials will enforce Gov. Andy Beshear's emergency order banning gatherings of more than 10 people in the coronavirus pandemic.
U.S. District Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove issued a temporary restraining order in a lawsuit filed Wednesday by Tabernacle Baptist Church of Nicholasville, but applied it broadly, saying Beshear and Health Secretary Eric Friedlander could not enforfce "the prohibition on mass gatherings with respect to any in-person religious service which adheres to applicable social-distancing and hygiene guidelines."
That language appears to permit the guidelines that Beshear issued Friday for in-person religious services beginning May 20, which include limiting attendance to one-third of capacity, maintaining six feet of physical distance between attendees, not providing communal food or beverages, avoiding handshaking and hugs, wearing masks or face coverings, and avoiding live choir or singing.
"Two other federal judges in Kentucky — David Hale of Louisville and William Bertelsman of Covington — had previously ruled that the ban on in-person church services was constitutional," reports Andrew Wolfson of the Louisville Courier Journal. "But after the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sent the case back to Hale, he also issued an injunction Friday night against enforcement of the order, pending the state's appeal."
That case was filed by Maryville Baptist Church in Hillview, which Beshear has said is the only church he knows of that has violated his order, and the only one where attendees were given notices to self-quarantine.
In the two cases and the political rhetoric around the issue, opponents of Beshear's order have argued that it is unconstitutional to prohibit in-person worship when customers patronize businesses that Beshear had deemed essential. During a hearing Friday, Van Tatenhove paraphrased a part of the church's complaint and asked an attorney for Beshear, "Why can someone safely walk down a grocery store aisle and not a pew?"
Beshear attorney Travis Mayos aid shopping is “transitory,” something concluded after purchases are made, while worship services have "congregants sit near one another for an hour or more," Wolfson reports. "Matthew Martens, a Washington lawyer for the church, said there is no time limit for shopping under Beshear’s order that allows visits to stores offering essential services. And Van Tatenhove, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, said during the hearing that the state introduced no scientific evidence that church services are inherently more dangerous."
U.S. District Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove issued a temporary restraining order in a lawsuit filed Wednesday by Tabernacle Baptist Church of Nicholasville, but applied it broadly, saying Beshear and Health Secretary Eric Friedlander could not enforfce "the prohibition on mass gatherings with respect to any in-person religious service which adheres to applicable social-distancing and hygiene guidelines."
That language appears to permit the guidelines that Beshear issued Friday for in-person religious services beginning May 20, which include limiting attendance to one-third of capacity, maintaining six feet of physical distance between attendees, not providing communal food or beverages, avoiding handshaking and hugs, wearing masks or face coverings, and avoiding live choir or singing.
"Two other federal judges in Kentucky — David Hale of Louisville and William Bertelsman of Covington — had previously ruled that the ban on in-person church services was constitutional," reports Andrew Wolfson of the Louisville Courier Journal. "But after the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sent the case back to Hale, he also issued an injunction Friday night against enforcement of the order, pending the state's appeal."
That case was filed by Maryville Baptist Church in Hillview, which Beshear has said is the only church he knows of that has violated his order, and the only one where attendees were given notices to self-quarantine.
In the two cases and the political rhetoric around the issue, opponents of Beshear's order have argued that it is unconstitutional to prohibit in-person worship when customers patronize businesses that Beshear had deemed essential. During a hearing Friday, Van Tatenhove paraphrased a part of the church's complaint and asked an attorney for Beshear, "Why can someone safely walk down a grocery store aisle and not a pew?"
Beshear attorney Travis Mayos aid shopping is “transitory,” something concluded after purchases are made, while worship services have "congregants sit near one another for an hour or more," Wolfson reports. "Matthew Martens, a Washington lawyer for the church, said there is no time limit for shopping under Beshear’s order that allows visits to stores offering essential services. And Van Tatenhove, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, said during the hearing that the state introduced no scientific evidence that church services are inherently more dangerous."
Beshear has said he is treating all gatherings alike, "but Deputy Attorney General Barry Dunn noted that every day eight to 12 people, including reporters, gather in the governor's office for his daily briefing," Wolfson reports. "He submitted photos as evidence." Dunn works for state Attorney General Daniel Cameron, who joined the case as a co-plaintiff.
The church said in its suit that it "has a sincerely-held religious belief that online services and drive-in services do not meet the Lord’s requirement that the church meet together in person for corporate worship, and cited Hebrews 10:25, which calls for “not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together.”
At the start of his opinion, Van Tatenhove wrote, "This is a hard and difficult time. A new virus sweeps the world, ravages our economy and threatens our health. Public officials, including the defendants in this case, make minute-by-minute decisions with the best of intentions and the goal of saving the health and lives of our citizens. But what of that enduring Constitution in times like these? Does it mean something different because society is desperate for a cure or prescription?"
Van Tatenhove said in a 13-page opinion that Beshear "must have a compelling reason for using his authority to limit a citizen’s right to freely exercise something we value greatly—the right of every American to follow their conscience on matters related to religion. . . . Despite an honest motive, it does not appear at this preliminary stage that reason exists."
0 comments:
Post a Comment